Earlier this month, President Biden announced that OSHA was developing a new rule to require all employees (at companies with at least 100 workers) to either get the COVID-19 vaccine or undergo weekly testing. The White House explained that this vaccine mandate will require employers “to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work.” This is expected to affect 80 million workers.
The libertarian legal intelligentsia immediately gravitated to one thing after the Biden vaccine mandate was announced: broccoli.
As congressional Democrats begin their internal haggling over how much of President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda to enact via budget reconciliation, pivotal Senator Joe Manchin seems intent on making one of the administration’s signature achievements worse.
On Sunday, Manchin floated the idea of attaching a work (or education) requirement to the advance Child Tax Credit. “Let’s make sure we’re getting it to the right people,” he insisted. “There’s no work requirements whatsoever. There’s no education requirements.. Don’t you think if you want to help the children, the people should make some effort?”
Manchin’s position would needlessly over-complicate what could…
I was a sophomore in college in 2009 the first time I learned that a “child allowance” is a thing that exists in the world.
I was getting ready to study Dutch social policy during a summer study abroad program at the University of Amsterdam. To prepare, I was reading up on the country that would be hosting me for the summer, and came across a New York Times Magazine article by Russell Shorto, an American expat living in the Netherlands. He wrote about what it was like to discover a generous European social insurance system through American eyes:
Days before his inauguration, President Biden unveiled the American Rescue Plan, a $1.9 trillion package to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and provide relief to American families. The plan includes a significant expansion of the Child Tax Credit, one of the country’s largest financial benefits for families with children.
This would provide meaningful aid to many American families, particularly those with low incomes. But it could be made even more effective if Biden goes a step further and converts the annual tax credit into a monthly direct payment to support families year-round.
The CTC currently reduces some families’ tax liability by…
Schools have become the leading edge of pandemic politics. As a new school year dawns, so too is the realization that much of the country is in no shape to reopen the schoolhouse gates. That means parents and families will continue to bear the costs of virus containment, and of our collective failure to get the virus under control sooner — costs imposed on their professional lives, their family structure, their social supports, and their children’s wellbeing.
Those costs imposed on families in the name of public health ought to be compensated, in the form monthly checks from the government.
The United States just enacted the largest fiscal stimulus package in its history in response to the coronavirus pandemic. The $2 trillion coronavirus relief bill will cut $1,200 checks to most Americans, significantly boost unemployment benefits, and offer some $500 billion in aid to businesses.
But it may not be enough to stave off economic catastrophe. Bigger, more innovative government intervention into the economy is going to be needed. And the type of intervention we need is something that even political conservatives ought to be able to learn to love.
As the global coronavirus outbreak increasingly engulfs the United States, a mammoth public health crisis is simultaneously breeding a dire economic crisis. A panicked stock market has cratered. Economic activity has ground to a halt as workers and consumers isolate at home. The economy may well slip into recession very soon.
The Trump administration has made some belated gestures at economic aid, including promising millions of borrowers with student loan relief. But the emerging fine print shows that President Trump’s promise of “No Interest on Student Loans” is turning out to be a pointless bait and switch.
With voting in the 2020 presidential primary beginning in just a few days, many Democrats feel increasingly perplexed when it comes to discerning which candidate’s politics offers the surest path to the White House. Is it Joe Biden’s comforting bid for a third Obama administration term? Or Bernie Sanders’s tent-expanding political revolution? Or Elizabeth Warren’s thoroughly-planned promise of Big Structural Change?
In a time of choosing, it would seem wise to reflect on how Democrats last got themselves out of the political wilderness and back into the White House. …
We could get a decision any day now from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on whether the entire Affordable Care Act has been rendered unconstitutional by the 2017 Republican tax law. While we wait, it’s worth lifting up a novel argument in defense of the ACA offered in court by the insurance lobby: that the individual mandate operated as little more than a set of training wheels to get the law up and running.
The theory behind the latest legal attack on Obamacare is that the law cannot be severed from its allegedly now-unconstitutional individual mandate, which Congress gutted…
Obamacare’s much-besieged individual mandate lived a short, contentious life. Requiring all Americans to purchase health insurance from 2014 through 2018, the mandate survived a direct Supreme Court challenge in 2012 before it even took effect, and then another indirect court attack in 2015. It survived a torrent of repeal attempts by congressional Republicans, only to finally be unceremoniously slain as a budgetary gimmick in the GOP’s 2018 reconciliation tax bill. Rest in peace, individual mandate.